Why Plea Bargaining in Criminal Trials is Important :: Plea Bargain Trial Court Justice Essays

Why Plea Bargaining in Criminal Trials is substantial Screeech That is the sound of our court system coming to a grindinghalt, if plea bargaining were no longer utilized. Not only does plea bargaining dispense with taxpayers an enormous amount of money, it often provides the evidence for aconviction and allows public defenders and other court officials to concentratetheir limited resources on more important or difficult cases. Some people whitethornbelieve that plea bargaining with criminals is wrong. The entire basis of theargument against plea bargaining says that criminals should not testify or haveanything to do with the prosecution because they were involved with the crime.We fail to realize that without plea bargaining many criminals would never bepunished for their crimes at all. It is as impartial as that. Granted, a pleabargain is, by definition, a compromise. But it is a compromise that isabsolutely necessary for the judicial system to function. While it may seemthat a person who exchanges his testimonial for a lighter sentence would havesufficient motivation to lie in court the fact is that his testimony is simplyverifying the testimonies of other witnesses. In a majority of cases pleabargains is utilized to ensure that the truly guilty criminal is punished. Inour less than finished world, plea bargaining is easily the lesser of the evils. I agree with the definitions submitted by the affirmative speaker. Americans have always emphasized getting a job done. We frame a greatdeal of value on efficiency and industry. The government is expected to runwith efficiency and operate with the good of the people in mind. every(prenominal) aspectof our lives is governed by this utilitarian value. Why do we place suchimportance on efficiency? Because without it nothing would ever get done. Ifwe all always obsessed over minute details and unrealistic ideals we wouldlive in poverty. In the real world compromises are made because without them noamo unt of advantage could ever be achieved. In the words of John Stewart Mill,the father of utilitarianism, The creed which accepts as the foundation ofmorals utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are refine in proportion as they promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce thereverse of happiness. This means that in a world of compromise, the closelysuccess is achieved by giving the greatest good to the greatest number of people. This belief applies directly to plea bargaining.